Chris Rhodes v. Lamar Gudger, III, GUDGER & GUDGER ATTORNEYS AT LAW, Asheville, North Carolina, for

05-1626Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 20, 2006

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1626
CHRIS RHODES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg,
District Judge. (CA-04-22-1)
Submitted: March 10, 2006 Decided: April 20, 2006
Before MICHAEL, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
V. Lamar Gudger, III, GUDGER & GUDGER ATTORNEYS AT LAW, Asheville,
North Carolina, for Appellant. Gretchen C. F. Shappert, United
States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, Paul Taylor, Assistant
United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, Robert Triba,
Regional Chief Counsel, Lisa G. Smoller, Special Assistant U.S.
Attorney, Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Chris Rhodes appeals the district court’s order granting
the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment and affirming the
Commissioner’s denial of Social Security benefits. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Rhodes v.
Commissioner, No. CA-04-22-1 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 31, 2005). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.