The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-1510•Poopak Ta’ati v. Board of Trustees of Montgomery Community College
05-1510Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 20, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1510
POOPAK TA’ATI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MONTGOMERY COMMUNITY
COLLEGE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (CA-03-
2097-RWT; CA-04-3799-RWT)
Submitted: March 3, 2006 Decided: March 20, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Poopak Ta’ati, Appellant Pro Se. Sharon Veronica Burrell, Joann
Robertson, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Rockville, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Poopak Ta’ati appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment to the Defendant on her employment discrimination
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court in the bench hearing of April 18, 2005. See
Ta’ati v. Board of Trustees of Montgomery Community College, Nos.
CA-03-2097-RWT; CA-04-3799-RWT (D. Md. Apr. 18, 2005). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.