The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-1501•Martha Gray v. Richmond Public Schools
05-1501Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 4, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1501
MARTHA GRAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RICHMOND PUBLIC SCHOOLS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District
Judge. (CA-04-692-3)
Submitted: September 30, 2005 Decided: November 4, 2005
Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Martha Gray, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Ploszay Karn,
MCGUIREWOODS, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Martha Gray appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment in favor of the defendant in her Title VII action
in which she alleged age discrimination. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See Gray v. Richmond Pub. Sch.,
No. CA-04-692-3 (E.D. Va. Apr. 20, 2005). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.