The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-1483•Cheryl Schwender v. Erie Insurance Company
05-1483Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 28, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1483
CHERYL SCHWENDER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ERIE INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,
District Judge. (CA-03-94-5)
Submitted: December 22, 2005 Decided: December 28, 2005
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cheryl Schwender, Appellant Pro Se. James Downey Lamp, Sheryl Ann
Rucker, LAMP, ODELL, BARTRAM, LEVY & TRAUTWEIN, PLLC, Huntington,
West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
PER CURIAM:
Cheryl Schwender appeals from the district court’s orders
denying her motion and renewed motion for a more definite response
and denying relief in her civil action in which she asserted that
her insurance company engaged in unfair insurance practices in
determining that she was at fault in an automobile accident. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Schwender v. Erie Ins. Co., No. CA-03-94-5 (N.D.W. Va.
Apr. 1 & 5, 2005). We deny Erie Insurance Company’s motion for
sanctions and dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.