Ronald Dick v. Barnhart, No. CA-04-762-WGC D. Md. Apr. 7, 2005 . We deny Dick’s pending motions to…

05-1470Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 14, 2005

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1470
RONALD DICK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social
Security,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. William Connelly, Magistrate Judge.
(CA-04-762-WGC)
Submitted: October 31, 2005 Decided: November 14, 2005
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald Dick, Appellant Pro Se. Neil Ray White, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

*The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate
judge under 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c) (West Supp. 2005).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Ronald Dick appeals the district court’s order granting
the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment in his claim
challenging the application of the Windfall Elimination Provision
to his Social Security benefits. We have reviewed the record and
the magistrate judge’s opinion * and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate
judge. See Dick v. Barnhart, No. CA-04-762-WGC (D. Md. Apr. 7,
2005). We deny Dick’s pending motions to “Supplement the Record on
Appeal,” “Regarding MSPB Ruling,” to “Consolidate Issues,” and for
“Further Ruling.” We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.