Khruawan Saevoon v. DONALD E. POWELL, Chairman, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1468
KHRUAWAN SAEVOON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DONALD E. POWELL, Chairman, Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (CA-04-765-1)
Submitted: March 30, 2006 Decided: April 5, 2006
Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
E. Ned Sloan, SLOAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Washington, D.C.; S. Howard
Woodson, III, LAW OFFICES OF S. H. WOODSON, III, PC, Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney,
Rachel C. Ballow, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Khruawan Saevoon appeals a district court order granting
summary judgment to the FDIC on her claim of failure to promote
based on gender, race, and national origin discrimination pursuant
to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, see 41 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000, et seq.
(West 2000 & Supp. 2005) (Title VII). Saevoon was employed as a
computer specialist with the FDIC. The district court held that
Saevoon’s discrimination claims failed because she had not shown
that the nondiscriminatory reasons given by the FDIC for not
promoting her were pretextual.
After reviewing the parties’ briefs and the applicable
law, we conclude that the district court correctly decided the
issues before it. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Saevoon v. Powell, No. CA-04-765-1 (E.D. Va.
filed Mar. 31, 2005 & entered Apr. 6, 2005). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --