The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-1452•Gussie Minus v. Dak Americas
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1452
GUSSIE MINUS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DAK AMERICAS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District
Judge. (CA-03-4029-2-23)
Submitted: August 18, 2005 Decided: August 23, 2005
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gussie Minus, Appellant Pro Se. Stacy Kaplan Wood, PARKER, POE,
ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, L.L.P., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Gussie Minus appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary
judgment in favor of DAK Americas in Minus’ employment
discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Minus v. DAK Americas, No. CA-03-4029-2-23
(D.S.C. Mar. 14, 2005). Minus’ motions to expedite are denied as
moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.