The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-1372•Beth F. Jones v. Ukrop’s Supermarkets, Incorporated
05-1372Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 21, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1372
BETH F. JONES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UKROP’S SUPERMARKETS, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (CA-04-833-3)
Submitted: October 31, 2005 Decided: November 21, 2005
Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert P. Geary, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Lynn F. Jacob,
Aaron S. Walters, WILLIAMS MULLEN, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Beth F. Jones appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her civil action alleging employment discrimination
under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Jones v. Ukrop’s Supermarkets, Inc., No. CA-04-833-3
(E.D. Va. Feb. 23, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.