The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-1349•Patrick Mattete v. ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General
05-1349Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 30, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1349
PATRICK MATTETE,
Petitioner,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A96-451-506)
Submitted: August 17, 2005 Decided: August 30, 2005
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Patrick Mattete, Petitioner Pro Se. Carol Federighi, M. Jocelyn
Lopez Wright, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,
D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Patrick Mattete, a native and citizen of Tanzania,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals affirming the Immigration Judge’s order denying his
applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection
under the Convention Against Torture. Mattete disputes the finding
that he failed to meet his burden of proof to qualify for
withholding of removal. We have reviewed the record and conclude
that substantial evidence supports the finding that Mattete failed
to demonstrate eligibility for this relief. See 8 C.F.R.
§ 1208.16(b) (2005).
We accordingly deny the petition for review. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.