The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-1324•Danny Ray Coleman v. Michael Edwards, individually
05-1324Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 20, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1324
DANNY RAY COLEMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MICHAEL EDWARDS, individually and in his
capacity as a deputy sheriff for Columbus
County, North Carolina; COLUMBUS COUNTY, North
Carolina,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (CA-04-193)
Submitted: October 7, 2005 Decided: October 20, 2005
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Everett Robinson, ROBINSON LAW OFFICE, Rocky Mount, North
Carolina, for Appellant. Norwood P. Blanchard, III, CRANFILL,
SUMNER & HARTZOG, L.L.P., Wilmington, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Danny Ray Coleman appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and related state law claims
arising out of an arrest based on mistaken identity. We have
reviewed the record included on appeal, and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm. See Thompson v. Prince William
County, 753 F.2d 363, 364 (4th Cir. 1985); Smith v. Hefner, 68
S.E.2d 783, 787 (N.C. 1952). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.