The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-1307•Edward E. Stroupe, Jr v. Radio Shack
05-1307Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 14, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1307
EDWARD E. STROUPE, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RADIO SHACK; TANDY CORPORATION; TRANSPORTATION
INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Abingdon. Glen M. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (CA-05-13-1)
Submitted: June 9, 2005 Decided: June 14, 2005
Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward E. Stroupe, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Cameron Scott Bell, PENN,
STUART & ESKRIDGE, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Edward E. Stroupe, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Stroupe v. Radio Shack, No. CA-05-13-1 (W.D.
Va. Mar. 2, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.