The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-1274•Amy Schuele v. Stratia Group, Incorporated
05-1274Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 29, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1274
AMY SCHUELE; DOUGLAS SCHUELE, individually and
on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
STRATIA GROUP, INCORPORATED; GREG BARRETT,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
STRATIA EDUCATION, LLC; DANIEL E. HAUG;
CAPITAL RESOURCE GROUP, INCORPORATED,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-04-
2970-AMD)
Submitted: November 4, 2005 Decided: November 29, 2005
Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark E. Herman, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellants.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Amy Schuele and Douglas Schuele appeal the district
court’s orders dismissing their complaint without prejudice based
on failure to serve process and denying their motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Schuele v. Stratia Group, Inc., No. CA-04-
2970-AMD (D. Md. Feb. 4, 2005). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.