George E. Pickett v. Washington Mutual Bank Fa

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1261
GEORGE E. PICKETT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK FA; WILLIAM WALT
PETTIT; W. J. KELLAM, JR.; KELLAM & PETTIT,
PA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (CA-03-45-7)
Submitted: November 23, 2005 Decided: December 16, 2005
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George E. Pickett, Appellant Pro Se. John Weldon O’Tuel, III,
WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Raleigh, North Carolina; Vaiden
Pearson Kendrick, Wilmington, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
George E. Pickett appeals from the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants on his civil
action arising out of a lengthy dispute with his mortgage lender.
Our review of the record, including the district court’s thorough
opinion, discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Pickett v.
Washington Mutual Bank, No. CA-03-45-7 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 2, 2005). We
deny Pickett’s motion for injunction and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --