Sandra D. Lynch v. Ikon Office Solutions, Incorporated

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1202
SANDRA D. LYNCH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Carl Horn, III,
Magistrate Judge. (CA-04-81)
Submitted: July 29, 2005 Decided: August 26, 2005
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sandra D. Lynch, Appellant Pro Se. Sheri Lea Roberson, WOMBLE,
CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

*The case was decided by a magistrate judge with the parties’
consent. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Sandra D. Lynch appeals the district court’s order *
granting summary judgment to the Defendant on her claims of
employment discrimination and retaliation based on race, gender,
and disability, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42
U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000), and the Americans with
Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to 12213 (2000). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
while we grant Lynch’s motion to submit the case on briefs without
oral argument, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Lynch v. Ikon Office Solutions, Inc., No. CA-04-81
(W.D.N.C. Feb. 16, 2005). We deny Lynch’s motion for summary
disposition, deny Lynch’s motion to compel and for sanctions, and
deny as moot Lynch’s motion to expedite the appeal. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --