The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-1161•Paul L. Shumpert v. Mancor Carolina, Incorporated
05-1161Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 13, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1161
PAUL L. SHUMPERT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MANCOR CAROLINA, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (CA-00-2480-3)
Submitted: August 29, 2005 Decided: September 13, 2005
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chalmers C. Johnson, CHALMERS JOHNSON LAW FIRM, Charleston, South
Carolina, for Appellant. Vincent A. Sheheen, SAVAGE, ROYALL &
SHEHEEN, L.L.P., Camden, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Paul L. Shumpert appeals the district court’s order
accepting the revised report and recommendation of the magistrate
judge and granting summary judgment to the Defendant in this
employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See Shumpert v. Mancor Carolina, Inc., No.
CA-00-2480-3 (D.S.C. filed Jan. 27, 2005 & entered Jan. 28, 2005).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.