The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-1132•Kenneth Ray Pruitt v. BILLY PERNELL, Sharpsburg Police Chief
05-1132Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 3, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1132
KENNETH RAY PRUITT,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
BILLY PERNELL, Sharpsburg Police Chief; TOWN
OF SHARPSBURG, NC; M. L. FELLNER, Officer;
JOEL BATCHELOR, Officer,
Defendants - Appellants,
and
GEORGE BOTTOMS, Officer,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (CA-02-270-5-BO)
Submitted: February 28, 2006 Decided: April 3, 2006
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Scott Christopher Hart, SUMRELL, SUGG, CARMICHAEL, HICKS & HART,
P.A., New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellants. Kenneth Ray
Pruitt, Appellee Pro Se.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Appellants appeal the district court’s order denying
qualified immunity in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Pruitt v.
Pernell, No. CA-02-270-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 5, 2005). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.