The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-1086•Victoria Lane v. Patrick Mobile Home Park, Incorporated
05-1086Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 4, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1086
VICTORIA LANE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PATRICK MOBILE HOME PARK, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(CA-03-4043)
Submitted: April 27, 2005 Decided: May 4, 2005
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Victoria Lane, Appellant Pro Se. Kathryn Malloy Cook, COOK AND
ROY, North Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Victoria Lane appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to dismiss
Lane’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
while we grant Lane leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Lane v.
Patrick Mobile Home Park, Inc., No. CA-03-4043 (D.S.C. Dec. 9,
2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.