The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-8027•Itzhak Shalom v. United States of America
04-8027Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 5, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-8027
ITZHAK SHALOM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District Judge.
(CA-04-311-BEL)
Submitted: April 28, 2005 Decided: May 5, 2005
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Itzhak Shalom, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Slaymaker Sale, Assistant
United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Itzhak Shalom appeals from the district court’s order
denying in part and granting in part his Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g)
motion for the return of seized property. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Shalom v. United
States, No. CA-04-311-BEL (D. Md. Nov. 8, 2004). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.