United States of America v. Maurice Anthony King

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-8020
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MAURICE ANTHONY KING,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (CR-02-402)
Submitted: February 9, 2005 Decided: February 17, 2005
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Maurice Anthony King, Appellant Pro Se. Olivia N. Hawkins, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Maurice A. King appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for production of transcripts at government
expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis
on appeal, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
United States v. King, No. CR-02-402 (E.D. Va. Dec. 2, 2004). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --