The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-7983•Oladayo Oladokun v. United States of America
04-7983Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 5, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7983
OLADAYO OLADOKUN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-04-1399-AW)
Submitted: April 28, 2005 Decided: May 5, 2005
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Oladayo Oladokun, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Michael DiBiagio,
United States Attorney, Barbara Slaymaker Sale, Assistant United
States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland; Jane Frances Nathan, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Oladayo Oladokun seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying his petition for writ of error coram nobis. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Oladokun v. United States, No. CA-04-1399-
AW (D. Md. filed Nov. 18, 2004 & entered Nov. 19, 2004). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.