The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-7966•Dion Wyvis Coleman v. Carolyn Tucker, Lpn
04-7966Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 2, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7966
DION WYVIS COLEMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CAROLYN TUCKER, LPN; J. CASTANZA; DR. SCOTT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District
Judge. (CA-03-131-2)
Submitted: April 22, 2005 Decided: May 2, 2005
Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dion Wyvis Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Donna L. Foster, Rodney Kyle
Adams, Anne Catherine Cardea, LECLAIR RYAN, PC, Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Dion Wyvis Coleman appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Coleman v. Tucker, No. CA-03-131-2 (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 16, 2004 &
entered Nov. 17, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.