The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-7964•Terrance Lamount James v. J. HUBERS, Sergeant, Central Prison
04-7964Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 15, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7964
TERRANCE LAMOUNT JAMES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
J. HUBERS, Sergeant, Central Prison; ROBERT
TERRY, JR., Hearing Officer, Central Prison;
DONNIE R. RAYNOR, Lieutenant, Central Prison;
HATTIE B. PIMPONG, Chief Disciplinary Hearing
Officer, Central Prison,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (CA-04-599-5-BO)
Submitted: March 10, 2005 Decided: March 15, 2005
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terrance Lamount James, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Terrance Lamount James appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See James v.
Hubers, No. CA-04-599-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 3, 2004). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.