The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-7933•Lonnie Everett v. Trooper Wilkerson
04-7933Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 4, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7933
LONNIE EVERETT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TROOPER WILKERSON; TROOPER BRANCH; I. GRAHAM
PRUITT, Magistrate at Pitt County Detention
Center; STACEY A. PHIPPS, Associate Attorney
General,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,
District Judge. (CA-04-569-5-4)
Submitted: April 28, 2005 Decided: May 4, 2005
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lonnie Everett, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Lonnie Everett appeals the district court’s order
dismissing as time-barred his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2000). See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2000). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Everett v. Wilkerson, No. CA-04-569-5-4 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 20, 2004).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.