The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-7894•Curtis Dale Richardson v. PHILLIP R. THOMPSON, Sheriff of Horry County, in his individual
04-7894Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 30, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7894
CURTIS DALE RICHARDSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PHILLIP R. THOMPSON, Sheriff of Horry County,
in his individual and official capacity;
OFFICERS, of J Rueben Long Detention Center as
Horry County Sheriff’s Deputies in their
individual and official capacities,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(CA-04-1256-4-27)
Submitted: March 24, 2005 Decided: March 30, 2005
Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Curtis Dale Richardson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Curtis Dale Richardson appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as frivolous. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Richardson v.
Thompson, No. CA-04-1256-4-27 (D.S.C. Oct. 8, 2004). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.