The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-7827•Paul E. Anderson v. DR. KOLONGO, H.R.R.J. Medical Doctor
04-7827Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 20, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7827
PAUL E. ANDERSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DR. KOLONGO, H.R.R.J. Medical Doctor,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
ROY W. CHERRY, Warden, Superintendent; C.
HALL, Health Service Admin.,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District
Judge. (CA-03-1592-1)
Submitted: April 1, 2005 Decided: April 20, 2005
Before KING and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Paul E. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Coreen Antoinette Bromfield,
RAWLS & MCNELIS, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Paul E. Anderson appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Anderson v. Kolongo, No. CA-03-1592-1 (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 25, 2004
& entered Oct. 26, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.