The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-7814•Thomas Lattie McLamb v. PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden, LSCI Butner, North Carolina
04-7814Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 6, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7814
THOMAS LATTIE MCLAMB,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden, LSCI Butner,
North Carolina,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief
District Judge. (CA-04-600-5-FL)
Submitted: May 25, 2005 Decided: June 6, 2005
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas Lattie McLamb, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Thomas Lattie McLamb, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under
28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See McLamb v. Stansberry, No. CA-04-600-5-FL
(E.D.N.C. Oct. 19, 2004). We grant McLamb’s motion to file a
document styled as a formal brief, and we have considered the
arguments therein. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.