The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-7813•Michael J. Williams v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 1971 . - 2 - PER…
04-7813Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 29, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7813
MICHAEL J. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
HARLEY G. LAPPIN; KIM WHITE; B. G. COMPTON;
JERRY JONES; OFFICER STRICKLAND; OFFICER
STORY; G. COOPER; OFFICER GIDDINS; OFFICER
MOLLICA; JESSICA JONES; OFFICER TORRES;
OFFICER BOURQUE; C/O FLANARY; OFFICER JOHNSON;
OFFICER ELDRIDGE; OFFICER MARQUES; HARRELL
WATTS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District
Judge. (CA-04-625-7)
Submitted: March 28, 2005 Decided: April 29, 2005
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael J. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
*Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Michael J. Williams appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his Bivens* complaint. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Williams v. Lappin,
No. CA-04-625-7 (W.D. Va. filed Oct. 26, 2004; entered Oct. 27,
2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.