The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-7800•Wade Stephney v. SEASIDE TRUCK, Auto Sales & Auto Salesmen
04-7800Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 21, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7800
WADE STEPHNEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SEASIDE TRUCK, Auto Sales & Auto Salesmen;
BOBBY SANDERS; RONNIE SANDERS; T. J. HARRIS;
HORRY COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT; CRYSTAL BURKE;
NORTH BEACH CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT; PHIL
WEBSTER, Lieutenant; JOEL MCGARTLIN; J. W.
MILLER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District
Judge. (CA-04-1381-4-27BH)
Submitted: January 13, 2005 Decided: January 21, 2005
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wade Stephney, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Wade Stephney appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Stephney v.
Seaside Truck, No. CA-04-1381-4-27BH (D.S.C. Oct. 8, 2004). We
deny Stephney’s “Notice and Motion for Continue to Amended
Additional Defendant,” and dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.