Herbert Slater v. JOHN W. BLEDSOE, III, Esquire

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7793
HERBERT SLATER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN W. BLEDSOE, III, Esquire,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-04-21949-3-13BC)
Submitted: February 24, 2005 Decided: March 8, 2005
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Herbert Slater, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Herbert Slater appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
Slater’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See Slater v. Bledsoe, No. CA-04-
21949-3-13BC (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --