The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-7784•Ulysees Fulton v. P. DOUGLAS TAYLOR, Warden, Ridgeland Correctional Institute
04-7784Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 3, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7784
ULYSEES FULTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
P. DOUGLAS TAYLOR, Warden, Ridgeland
Correctional Institute,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(CA-03-3206)
Submitted: May 25, 2005 Decided: June 3, 2005
Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ulysees Fulton, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Hodges Waldron, Jr., LAW
OFFICE OF DUFFIE STONE, LLC, Bluffton, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Ulysees Fulton appeals the district court’s order
adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing
his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Fulton v. Taylor,
No. CA-03-3206 (D.S.C. Oct. 20, 2004). We deny Fulton’s motion for
transcripts at government expense. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.