The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-7668•Thurman Rudolph Goodman v. A. ELLSWORTH, Shift Sergeant/CEO
04-7668Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 16, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7668
THURMAN RUDOLPH GOODMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
A. ELLSWORTH, Shift Sergeant/CEO; A. JONES,
Floor Deputy; A. HILLS, Medical CEO,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-04-579)
Submitted: February 9, 2005 Decided: February 16, 2005
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thurman Rudolph Goodman, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Thurman Rudolph Goodman appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action as frivolous
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2000). We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Goodman v. Ellsworth, No. CA-04-579 (E.D. Va. Oct. 6,
2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.