The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-7663•Byron Shawntele George v. County of Craven
04-7663Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 19, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7663
BYRON SHAWNTELE GEORGE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
COUNTY OF CRAVEN; JERRY MONETTE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,
District Judge. (CA-04-282-5-H)
Submitted: April 14, 2005 Decided: April 19, 2005
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Byron Shawntele George, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Byron Shawntele George appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that
this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for
the reasons stated by the district court. See George v. County of
Craven, No. CA-04-282-5-H (E.D.N.C. filed Sept. 22, 2004; entered
Sept. 27, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.