Esteban Garcia v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 1971 . - 2 - PER…

04-7642Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 18, 2005

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7642
ESTEBAN GARCIA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WARDEN BROOKS, Medical Administrator; MS
MENDOZA, FCI Petersburg; DOCTOR ALLEN, FCI
Petersburg,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (CA-04-133-2)
Submitted: February 25, 2005 Decided: March 18, 2005
Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Esteban Garcia, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Richard Leonard,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

*Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Esteban Garcia appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his Bivens * complaint. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Garcia v. Brooks, No. CA-04-133-
2 (E.D. Va. Sept. 27, 2004). We deny Garcia’s motion for
appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.