Bryce M. Tuller v. D. Braxton

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7612
BRYCE M. TULLER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
D. BRAXTON; J. ARMENTROUT; R. FOWLER; L.
HUFFMAN; R. ANGELONE,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
UNNAMED DEFENDANTS,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (CA-02-1297-7)
Submitted: April 20, 2005 Decided: April 28, 2005
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bryce M. Tuller, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Bryce M. Tuller appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Tuller v.
Braxton, No. CA-02-1297-7 (W.D. Va. filed Sept. 17, 2004; entered
Sept. 22, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --