The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-7572•United States of America v. Edward Stargen, a/k/a Cousin
04-7572Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 17, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7572
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
EDWARD STARGEN, a/k/a Cousin,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,
District Judge. (CR-99-30)
Submitted: December 9, 2004 Decided: December 17, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward Stargen, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. McWilliams, Jr.,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Edward Stargen appeals a district court order denying his
motion for reconsideration under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure and seeking relief as a writ of error coram nobis.
We have reviewed the record and the district court order and affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.
Stargen, No. CR-99-30 (N.D.W. Va., Sept. 2, 2004). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.