The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-7493•Paul M. Omar v. JOSEPH M. BROOKS, Warden
04-7493Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 15, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7493
PAUL M. OMAR,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
JOSEPH M. BROOKS, Warden; CAROLYN D. DUNSON,
Case Manager; K. M. WHITE, Regional Director;
HARRELL WATTS; HARRIS LAPPIN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District
Judge. (CA-04-248)
Submitted: February 9, 2005 Decided: February 15, 2005
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul M. Omar, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Paul M. Omar appeals the district court’s order accepting
the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying relief on his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Omar v. Brooks, No. CA-04-248
(E.D. Va. Aug. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.