The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-7421•Alexander S v. William R. Byars
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7421
ALEXANDER S.; ALFRED S.; BENNY B.; CHRISTOPHER
M.; LAFAYETTE M.; RICKY S., by and through
their Guardian ad Litem; NANCY C. MCCORMICK,
Guardian ad Litem,
Plaintiffs - Appellees,
and
INEZ MOORE TENENBAUM, individually and as
representatives of a class of juveniles; LESLY
A. BOWERS, Guardian ad Litem,
Plaintiffs,
versus
WILLIAM R. BYARS, in his official capacity as
Director of the Department of Juvenile
Justice,
Defendant - Appellee,
JOSEPH YOUNGINER, Special Master,
Appellee,
and
GINA E. WOOD, in her official capacity as
Director of the Department of Juvenile
Justice; RICHARD E. MCLAWHORN, individually
-- 1 of 4 --
- 2 -
and in his official capacity as former
Commissioner of the Department of Juvenile
Justice for the State of South Carolina; JOHN
F. HENRY, individually and in his official
capacities as a former Board Member for the
South Carolina Department of Juvenile Justice;
FRANK MAULDIN, individually and in his
official capacity as a former Board Member for
the South Carolina Department of Juvenile
Justice; KATHLEEN P. JENNINGS, individually
and in her official capacity as a former Board
Member for the South Carolina Department of
Juvenile Justice; JOSEPH W. HUDGENS,
individually and in his official capacity as a
former Board Member of the South Carolina
Department of Juvenile Justice; KAROLE JENSEN,
individually and in her official capacity as a
former Board Member for the South Carolina
Department of Juvenile Justice; J. P. NEAL,
individually and in his official capacity as a
former Board Member for the South Carolina
Department of Juvenile Justice; SOUTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF YOUTH SERVICES; FLORA BROOKS
BOYD, individually and in her official
capacity as Director of the Department of
Juvenile Justice;
Defendants,
RICHARD A. HARPOOTLIAN,
Amicus Curiae,
versus
VINCENT F. RIVERA,
Movant - Appellant.
-------------------------
MICHAEL W. MOORE, Director of the South
Carolina Department of Corrections,
-- 2 of 4 --
- 3 -
Movant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief
District Judge. (CA-90-3062-3-17)
Submitted: February 24, 2005 Decided: March 7, 2005
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vincent F. Rivera, Appellant Pro Se. W. Gaston Fairey, FAIREY,
PARISE & MILLS, PA, Columbia, South Carolina; Rochelle Romosca
McKim, Nancy C. McCormick, SOUTH CAROLINA PROTECTION & ADVOCACY FOR
THE HANDICAPPED, INC., Columbia, South Carolina; Larry Leroy
Vanderbilt, DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Vincent F. Rivera appeals from the district court’s
orders denying his motion to reopen a district court case or for
relief from the judgment, and denying his motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Bowers v. Boyd, No. CA-90-3062-3-17
(D.S.C. Aug. 16, 2004 & Oct. 6, 2004); see also Fed. R. Civ. P.
60(b). We deny Rivera’s motions to amend the caption and to
-- 3 of 4 --
- 4 -
supplement the record. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 4 of 4 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.