The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-7396•Patrick Lewis Rudd v. STEPHEN M. DEWALT, Warden, Federal Prison Camp
04-7396Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 14, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7396
PATRICK LEWIS RUDD,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
STEPHEN M. DEWALT, Warden, Federal Prison
Camp; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; UNITED STATES
OF AMERICA,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (CA-03-713-5-BO)
Submitted: February 9, 2005 Decided: February 14, 2005
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Patrick Lewis Rudd, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Patrick Lewis Rudd appeals the district court’s judgment
and orders denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition and his
motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the
district court orders and affirm for the reasoning of the district
court. See Rudd v. DeWalt, No. CA-03-713-5-BO (July 21, 2004 &
filed Sept. 17, 2004 & entered Sept. 21, 2004). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.