Paul Emmanuel Pelham v. Keith Cain

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7393
PAUL EMMANUEL PELHAM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
KEITH CAIN; STEVEN LANIER; MARSHALL EVANS;
CLINT SIMPSON; MICKEY SMITH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,
District Judge. (CA-03-134-5-H)
Submitted: January 28, 2005 Decided: February 16, 2005
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul Emmanuel Pelham, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Allen Davis, WOMBLE,
CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Paul Emmanuel Pelham appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Pelham v.
Cain, No. CA-03-134-5-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 13, 2004). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --