The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-7277•James B. Skipwith v. MELISSA E. FRASER, Assistant Public Defender
04-7277Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 22, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7277
JAMES B. SKIPWITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MELISSA E. FRASER, Assistant Public Defender;
NORA J. MILLER, Commonwealth Attorney;
WILLIAM L. WELLONS, Judge,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CA-04-452-2)
Submitted: October 14, 2004 Decided: October 22, 2004
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James B. Skipwith, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
James B. Skipwith appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find
that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Skipwith v.
Fraser, No. CA-04-452-2 (E.D. Va. Aug. 18, 2004). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.