The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-7272•Charles Anthony Walker v. CHUCK MOORE, Sheriff
04-7272Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 15, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7272
CHARLES ANTHONY WALKER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CHUCK MOORE, Sheriff; EILEEN SPRINKLE, Jail
Administrator; JERRY ANDERSON, Captain,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief
District Judge. (CA-04-406)
Submitted: December 9, 2004 Decided: December 15, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Anthony Walker, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Charles Anthony Walker appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice
for failing to comply with the court’s order that he particularize
and amend his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Walker v. Moore, No. CA-04-406 (E.D. Va.
filed July 15, 2004 & entered July 16, 2004). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.