The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-7267•Barry F. Robinson v. George E. Currie
04-7267Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 23, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7267
BARRY F. ROBINSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GEORGE E. CURRIE; MICHAEL A. MUNNS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,
District Judge. (CA-04-373-CT)
Submitted: November 18, 2004 Decided: December 23, 2004
Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Barry F. Robinson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Barry F. Robinson appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm because Robinson failed to state a claim upon which relief
may be granted. See Robinson v. Currie, No. CA-04-373-CT (E.D.N.C.
July 13, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.