The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-7262•Charles B. Brownell v. Secretary, Department of Public Safety
04-7262Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 5, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7262
CHARLES B. BROWNELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND
CORRECTIONAL SERVICES,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-04-124-AW)
Submitted: November 19, 2004 Decided: January 5, 2005
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles B. Brownell, Appellant Pro Se. David Phelps Kennedy,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
PER CURIAM:
Charles B. Brownell appeals the district court’s order
granting the motion to dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000)
complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state
a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See Brownell v. Secretary, Dep’t
of Pub. Safety & Corr. Servs., No. CA-04-124-AW (D. Md. July 1,
2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.