The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-7176•Dustin L. Carwile v. MRS. COMPTON, Personal Property Officer
04-7176Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 15, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7176
DUSTIN L. CARWILE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MRS. COMPTON, Personal Property Officer;
CAPTAIN JANEWAY; STAN K. YOUNG, Warden,
Wallens Ridge; GENE JOHNSON, Deputy Director
of Virginia Prisons; VINCE BOBROSKY; JANICE T.
DOW; LOUIS B. CEI; JAMES M. SISK; PRU
STASIKEWICH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (CA-03-154-2)
Submitted: October 7, 2004 Decided: October 15, 2004
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dustin L. Carwile, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Foster Barr, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Dustin L. Carwile appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Carwile v. Compton, No. CA-03-154-2 (E.D. Va. June 21, 2004). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.