The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-7158•United States of America v. LEON JACKSON, JR., a/k/a Juice, a/k/a Juicy
04-7158Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 29, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7158
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
LEON JACKSON, JR., a/k/a Juice, a/k/a Juicy,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CR-95-6-A)
Submitted: November 18, 2004 Decided: November 29, 2004
Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leon Jackson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Paul Joseph McNulty, United
States Attorney, Irvin McCreary Allen, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Leon Jackson, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders
denying his motion for reconsideration and to vacate sentence, and
for documents at Government expense. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.
Jackson, No. CR-95-6-A (E.D. Va. June 24, 2004 & July 7, 2004). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.