The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-7130•United States of America v. Alloric Tewan Lane
04-7130Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 24, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7130
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ALLORIC TEWAN LANE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District
Judge. (CR-97-147)
Submitted: September 16, 2004 Decided: September 24, 2004
Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alloric Tewan Lane, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker
Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Alloric Tewan Lane appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to compel the government to file a Fed. R. Crim.
P. 35(b) motion on his behalf. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See United States v. Lane, No. CR-
97-147 (D.S.C. June 22, 2004). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.