The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-7083•Gerry Lee Rouse, Sr v. KERMIT TENNIS, Police Officer
04-7083Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 21, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7083
GERRY LEE ROUSE, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
KERMIT TENNIS, Police Officer,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District
Judge. (CA-03-739-2)
Submitted: December 16, 2004 Decided: December 21, 2004
Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gerry Lee Rouse, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Melvin Wayne Ringer, CITY
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Gerry Lee Rouse, Sr. appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant and dismissing his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See Rouse v. Tennis, No. CA-03-739-2 (E.D.
Va. June 28, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.