The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-7052•Aaron Battle v. PAUL BOGENT, Doctor
04-7052Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 21, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7052
AARON BATTLE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PAUL BOGENT, Doctor; DOCTOR HASKETTES; NURSE
HARRIS; NURSE HOUSE,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (CA-03-277-3)
Submitted: October 14, 2004 Decided: October 21, 2004
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Aaron Battle, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Samuel Samet, GOODMAN,
ALLEN & FILETTI, Glen Allen, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Aaron Battle appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Battle v.
Bogent, No. CA-03-277-3 (E.D. Va. May 20, 2004). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.