The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-7024•United States of America v. Johnny Thomas
04-7024Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 9, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7024
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JOHNNY THOMAS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (CR-94-75; CA-04-331-5-F)
Submitted: January 28, 2005 Decided: February 9, 2005
Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Johnny Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Harold Franklin Askins, Assistant
Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Johnny Thomas appeals from the order of the district
court summarily dismissing his motion to vacate, set aside, or
correct his sentence filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).
The district court withdrew this order on June 1, 2004, one day
before Thomas noted his appeal to this court. In the absence of an
appealable final order, we lack appellate jurisdiction to hear
Thomas’ appeal. 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.