The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-6953•Daniel Temple, a/k/a Dan Temple v. Oconee County Mem’l Hosp., No. CA-02-3627 D.S.C. May 13, 2004 . Because Temple is…
04-6953Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 20, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6953
DANIEL TEMPLE, a/k/a Dan Temple,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
OCONEE COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL; SOUTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES; OCONEE
COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(CA-02-3627)
Submitted: August 12, 2004 Decided: August 20, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel Temple, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Daniel Temple appeals the district court’s judgment
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing
without prejudice his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See Temple v. Oconee County Mem’l
Hosp., No. CA-02-3627 (D.S.C. May 13, 2004). Because Temple is
proceeding on appeal under the PLRA, we deny the motion for in
forma pauperis status. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.